Who is the woman in this photo? Part 2

This blog post is Part 2 of “Who is the woman in this photo?” Click here to read Part 1.

For starters, I’ve re-posted the photos discussed in Part 1 which I will continue to discuss in Part 2.

The next two steps involve my attempt to identify the type of photography and clothing style in order to place the photos in a particular time period.

STEP #1 – Identify and date photo type

With the help of this great website, PhotoTree.com, it was fairly easy to determine that all three photos are “carte de visite”, otherwise known as “CDV”. First appearing in 1859, CDV was the first process to use a glass negative – which meant that customers could afford to purchase several copies for sharing with family and friends.

Some hallmarks of CDVs are –

  • Size:  Typically 2 3/8″ x 4 1/4″, although the size may vary up to 1/4″.
  • Corners: Square corners until 1870, then rounded corners.
  • Image size: The more the image fills the card, the later the date. By 1874, the image completely filled the card.
  • Thickness: Early cards were very thin but became thicker by 1870 and even thicker by 1880.

Conclusion: Since all three photos measure roughly 2 3/8″ x 4 1/4″, have rounded corners, large images, and the cards are very thick (although Photo #2 is thicker than the other two), it’s likely that Photos #1 and #3 are dated sometime after 1874 and Photo #2 after 1880.

STEP #2 – Identify and date clothing style

Next, I did some research regarding women’s fashion styles of the 19th century and came across this interesting article on the history of fashion, 1840-1900. The description of clothing in the 1880s seemed to be the closest match – tightly fitted bodice with narrow sleeves and high necklines.

Dresses in the prior decade (1870s) had more “flounces” and “ruching”, and low necklines were fashionable. By contrast, dresses in the next decade (1890s) were similar to the 1880s, except that the sleeve shape began changing in about 1893 – tight at the lower arm and puffed out at the upper arm.

Conclusion: Based on women’s clothing styles, Photos #1 and #3 are likely dated anywhere from the early 1880s through the early 1890s.

And then it happened – The “Ah Hah Moment!” when I realized that placing Photo #1 in the early 1880s through the early 1890s time frame meant that the woman in Photo #1 could be Brita. And if the woman was Brita, the small boy could be her son John. And perhaps John is also the boy in Photo #2?1

STEP #3 – Locate a record for “John”

I decided it was time to try and find some type of record for John. And I really lucked out here. It turned out Ancestry had recently acquired some Swedish records, so I easily located a birth record which I wrote about here – showing there was a baby boy named “Johan”, born to an “Andrew Dalin” and “Brita Johansdotter” in Hudiksvall, Sweden in 1887.2

Finally, everything seemed to be falling into place. My father’s story about the little boy named John appeared to be validated – and as a bonus, assuming the birth record is valid, I had possibly located a record indicating that Brita’s maiden name was “Johansdotter”.

STEP #4 – Now what?

I wasn’t sure what to do next – but as luck would have it, I came across the name of a woman who specializes in helping people analyze their family photos. Her web site is The Photo Detective and her name is Maureen Taylor. I scheduled a phone appointment and then emailed the following three photos:

All the information I had about Photo #1 has been previously stated. Here’s some information about the other two photos:

 Photo #2:

  • The boy in the front row, Walter Dalin, was the son of Andrew and Brita Dalin.
  • At least one of the other two girls, and possibly both, are daughters of Andrew and Brita.
  • The man second from the left in the back row is probably Andrew and the woman standing next to him is probably Brita.

Photo #3:

  • Several family members have identified this woman as Brita Dalin.
  • The handwriting on that photo appears to be Brita’s handwriting (based on a few other examples of her handwriting).

This is the end of Part 2. Part 3 includes a report on my phone call with Maureen. Stay tuned!

Copyright (c) 2016, Lark M. Dalin Robart

FOOTNOTES

  1. As for Photo #3, I decided for the time being to set it aside because I am unable to place this family – presumably a family consisting of a wife and husband with two children (girls, boys or one of each??) – in any scenario, given the information I currently have for Brita and Andrew. Assuming this photo was taken during the same time period as Photo #1, the only scenario of which I can currently conceive is that the adult female or adult male is a sibling of either Brita or Andrew. Another research project for another day.
  2. Sweden, Indexed Birth Records, 1860-1941, digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 04 April 2016), “Swedish Church Records Archive; Johanneshov, Sweden; Sweden, Indexed Birth Records, 1880-1920; GID Number: 100021.2.24500; Roll/Fiche Number: SC-1110; Volume: :937; Year Range: 1888, Johan Lars Anders Dahlin entry.

Who is the woman in this photo? Part 1

Photo #1
Photo #1

After several years of research and a recent phone session with The Photo Detective Maureen Taylor, I now believe that the woman in this photo, dated about 1890, is probably my great grandmother Brita Johansdotter1 Dalin and her son Johan.

But let me back up a bit and fill you in. Continue reading

  1. As to her maiden name, my current thinking is that it is probably “Johansdotter”. This issue is discussed in more detail in Part 3 of this blog post.

Tombstone Tuesday: Andrew and Brita Dalin

My Swedish great grandparents, Andrew and Brita Dalin, ca. 1910

I have very few photos of Andrew and Brita, and only this one where they are standing next to each other. The image is cropped from a larger group photo, probably taken on August 3rd, Watermelon Day – year unknown.

They are buried side by side in Oddfellows Cemetery in Helena, Montana.

Photo from Author’s collection, taken the summer of 2010

My records are a mess!!

Early last month, I made a promise to myself to finally – and once and for all – get my family history records and photos in order. It seems I spend more time looking for that “perfect photo” that will beautifully illustrate my blog – or more time digging for that “perfect record” that I was sure I found six months ago – than I do blogging or researching. It’s making me nuts!

At first I thought I might participate in The Genealogy Do-Over proposed by Thomas MacAntee but somehow it didn’t seem a good fit for me at this time – although I see the value in his system and I expect I’ll explore that process once I’m more organized.

After some internet searching, I came across Dear Myrtle’s FINALLY Get Organized system, which seemed like a better fit. It’s been slow going but I’m seeing the benefits already. And her organization system makes a lot of sense to me. I’ve been doing family history since my teens and have never come up with a filing system that quite works. But so far, her filing recommendations for both hard copy and digital files are working well.

The biggest surprise has to do with transcribing documents, which Dear Myrtle strongly recommends. I’ve always known in the back of my head I would have to do this task some day – but I’ve been putting it off. And I’m actually pleased to report just how beneficial transcribing a document can be. In several instances so far, I’ve discovered “new” information in documents I’ve had for years, but have never taken the time to analyze.

Here’s just one example: the 1940 U.S. Census record for my father’s parents, Cid and Fran Dalin. Just by taking a few minutes to transcribe this document, I learned a few new things about my grandparents:

  • My grandfather only had an 8th grade education.
  • In 1939, he had a steady job working 40 hours a week, as a shipping clerk in a cigar store. He earned $1,500 that year and did not receive money from any other source.
  • My grandmother had a high school education.
  • I could tell by the address given in the census that the family was living in the house that my father helped his father build – the one I had always visited as a child. But lately I had become curious to know when they actually moved into that house. Well, according to the census, they also lived in that house in 1935. I knew from the 1930 census that they lived in their “old” home next door in 1930 – so now I know they moved into the new house some time between 1930 and 1935.

These are the little details that family historians love to find. Yes, they are facts – but they’re the kind of facts that help fill in a story.

My grandmother's house circa 1946
My grandmother’s house circa 1946

This is a picture of the house where my father lived with his family in 1940. The photo was probably taken about 1946, several years before siding was installed on the main part of the house. Continue reading